ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Prognostic Impact of Notch1 Intracellular Domain, P63, and c-MYC in Lacrimal Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Disease-specific and overall survival for patients with lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma in recent decades.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Roles of MicroRNAs, Oncogenes, and Tumor Suppressor Gene Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: Therapeutic Potential of Pharmaceutical and Natural Products.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: a single-center series with contextual comparison to SEER data.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed whether NICD1 expression, c-MYC expression, and P63 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) correlate with prognosis and high-risk clinicopathological features in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Methods: Records of patients with lacrimal gland ACC who underwent surgery between 1998 to 2018 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic and treatment data were collected. Tumor tissues were subjected to light microscopy and IHC. Results: Of 43 patients treated during the study period, 21 had archived tumor tissue available and were included. The median age at diagnosis was 47 years, and 13 patients (62%) were male. Thirteen patients (62%) had T2 disease, and none had nodal or distant metastasis at diagnosis. Tumors were positive for NICD1 expression in eight cases (38%), c-MYC expression in eight (38%), and P63 expression in 11 (52%). Positive NICD1 expression was associated with predominantly solid (vs. cribriform/tubular) pattern (P < 0.001), treatment with orbital exenteration (vs. eye-sparing surgery) (P = 0.008), local recurrence (P = 0.047), and death (P = 0.012). Negative P63 expression was associated with predominantly solid pattern (P = 0.001), local recurrence (P = 0.012), distant metastasis (P = 0.001), and death (P = 0.035). A higher percentage of tumor cells staining for c-MYC was associated with presence of perineural invasion (P = 0.036). Positive NICD1 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 6.27; 95% CI, 1.29-30.46), whereas positive P63 expression was associated with better disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.0002-0.26). Conclusions: IHC for NICD1 and P63 should be considered in lacrimal gland ACC because of their prognostic value and potential as treatment targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.