ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
Pseudodominance in RFC1-Spectrum Disorder.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Characterisation of the RFC1 Repeat in an Australian Cohort.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) and disease spectrum is an autosomal recessive disorder associated with biallelic repeat expansion (RE) in the RFC1 gene. A high carrier frequency in the healthy population determines the possibility of having affected members in two consecutive generations. We describe pseudodominance in two families affected with RFC1 disorder (10 affected, 5 oligo/asymptomatic individuals). In Family A, after the 75-year-old index case was diagnosed with CANVAS, the 73-year-old wife decided to undergo screening for carrier testing. Although she did not report any symptoms, she resulted positive for the biallelic AAGGG RE thus leading to a diagnosis in the asymptomatic offspring as well and revealing a pseudodominant pattern of inheritance. In Family B pseudodominance was suspected after the identification of the RFC1 RE in the proband affected by sensitive neuropathy because of a positive family history for undetermined polyneuropathy in the mother. The post-mortem identification of the RFC1 RE in a sample specimen from the deceased mother, who had been under our care, allowed the solution of a "cold case". Our report suggests that pseudodominance is a confounding phenomenon to consider in RFC1-spectrum disorder and genetic counselling is instrumental in families with affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39230846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.