Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230835›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Human retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation.

Panayiotis P Ketonis, Thomas Q McClelland, Dani Parra, Gabriel A Radvansky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panayiotis P KetonisUniversity of Notre Dame, 366 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Thomas Q McClellandUniversity of Notre Dame, 366 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Dani ParraUniversity of Notre Dame, 366 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Gabriel A RadvanskyUniversity of Notre Dame, 366 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. gradvans@nd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-839X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports a reassessment of published literature on the question of whether retrograde amnesia data from patients with severe trauma supports the idea that there is ongoing consolidation of long-lasting memories. That is, memory consolidation continues for decades with older memories being increasingly consolidated, and, thus, more protected from forgetting. Our analysis was limited to patients with specific traumas rather than neurodegenerative conditions that can be complicated by the additional presence of significant anterograde amnesia. These constraints were used because trauma patients have a definitive start to their amnesia allowing comparison of their memories before this event, unlike when there is an undefined amnesia onset. Our results revealed that the standard account of retrograde amnesia only fits part of the data, with more than half not conforming to this account. Specifically, damage to different brain areas was associated with different patterns of retrograde amnesia. Those cases where the standard retrograde amnesia account was held tended to involve damage to the hippocampus and temporal lobes, as expected. Future directions to better understand the influence of retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation are suggested.

Indexed as

Amnesia, RetrogradeMemory ConsolidationHippocampusHumansConsolidationMemoryRetrograde amnesia

Identifiers

PMID39230835
PMCPMC11835974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.