SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
The coincidence of multiple sclerosis and primary vasculitis; from the bench of pathology to the bedside of treatment: a systematic review of case reports.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental risk factors of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
- Coincidence of Takayasu Arteritis and Multiple Sclerosis: Narrative Review and Case Report.Biomedicine hubArticle
- Pharmacological management of nystagmus: An in-depth review for clinical practice.Oman journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, disabling neurodegenerative disease, leads to reduced quality of life. The increasing prevalence of MS around the world and its comorbidities increase its burden. Primary vasculitis subtypes, one of autoimmune diseases with different prevalence in different ages and genders, should be considered one of the important differential diagnosis in patients with MS. This study aims to verify the relationship between MS and primary vasculitis by conducting a systematic review.
methodWe searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, from January 1974 to July 2023. We included original articles that reported characteristics of patients involved with any type of Primary Vasculitis with MS.
resultFrom an initial 816 publications, 18 studies consisting of 18 individual patients from 14 countries with confirmed MS and one of different subtypes of primary vasculitis met the inclusion criteria. The female/male ratio was 0.38:1, the mean (SD) age was 40.44 (14.37) years with the range of 16 to 70 years old, and the relapsing/progressive ratio was 1.57:1. Most of them, 14 (77%) experienced MS before vasculitis, and mostly received Corticosteroids, interferon, cyclophosphamide, Glatiramer acetate as MS treatment. The concurrence of Takayasu Arteritis (2 cases), Polyarteritis Nodosa (2 cases), Churg-Strauss Syndrome (1 case), Wegener's Granulomatosis (2 cases), Microscopic Polyangiitis (1 case), Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (5 cases), Good pasture's disease (5 cases) were reported with MS.
conclusionOur study suggested that different primary vasculitis can be an important comorbidity of MS and can mimic its symptoms and MRI. Any atypical syndrome for PwMS, whether clinical or radiological, must be evaluated in terms of other differential diagnoses including vasculitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39230834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.