ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Haemodynamic effect of dexmedetomidine during paediatric kidney transplantation.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Perioperative Management on Short-Term Renal Transplant Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDexmedetomidine is increasingly used for its ability to stabilise haemodynamic status during general anaesthesia. However, there is currently no data on paediatric kidney transplant recipients (pKTR). This study investigates the haemodynamic impact of dexmedetomidine administered perioperatively in pKTR.
methodsFrom 2019 to 2023, a retrospective study was conducted at Nantes University Hospital involving all pKTR under 18 years of age. The study compared intraoperative haemodynamic parameters between patients administered dexmedetomidine during kidney transplantation (DEX group) and those who did not receive it (no-DEX group). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored throughout the duration of anaesthesia and compared. Graft function was assessed based on creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at specific intervals. The perioperative use of fluids and vasoactive drugs, as well as their administration within 24 h post-surgery, were analysed.
resultsThirty-eight patients were enrolled, 10 in the DEX group and 28 in the no-DEX group. Intraoperative HR was similar between the groups; however, MAP was higher in the DEX group (mean difference 9, standard deviation (SD, 1-11) mmHg, p = 0.039). No differences were found regarding the use of fluid and vasoactive drug therapy between groups. GFR at 1 month post-transplantation was significantly elevated in the DEX group (p = 0.009).
conclusionspKTR receiving intraoperative dexmedetomidine exhibited higher perioperative MAP compared to those not administered dexmedetomidine. Additionally, the DEX group demonstrated superior graft function at 1 month. The direct impact of dexmedetomidine on immediate postoperative graft function in pTKR warrants further investigation in a prospective multicentre randomised study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39230733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.