Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230709›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Improving dictionary-based named entity recognition with deep learning.

Katerina Nastou, Mikaela Koutrouli, Sampo Pyysalo, Lars Juhl Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. VO: The Vaccine Ontology.Scientific data · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. VO: The Vaccine Ontology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katerina NastouNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3611-5726
Mikaela KoutrouliNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark.
Sampo PyysaloTurkuNLP Group, Department of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
Lars Juhl JensenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark.

Funding

Academy of Finland 332844European Union's Horizon 2020Marie Sklodowska-Curie 101023676Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF14CC0001Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF20SA0035590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDictionary-based named entity recognition (NER) allows terms to be detected in a corpus and normalized to biomedical databases and ontologies. However, adaptation to different entity types requires new high-quality dictionaries and associated lists of blocked names for each type. The latter are so far created by identifying cases that cause many false positives through manual inspection of individual names, a process that scales poorly.

resultsIn this work, we aim to improve block list s by automatically identifying names to block, based on the context in which they appear. By comparing results of three well-established biomedical NER methods, we generated a dataset of over 12.5 million text spans where the methods agree on the boundaries and type of entity tagged. These were used to generate positive and negative examples of contexts for four entity types (genes, diseases, species, and chemicals), which were used to train a Transformer-based model (BioBERT) to perform entity type classification. Application of the best model (F1-score = 96.7%) allowed us to generate a list of problematic names that should be blocked. Introducing this into our system doubled the size of the previous list of corpus-wide blocked names. In addition, we generated a document-specific list that allows ambiguous names to be blocked in specific documents. These changes boosted text mining precision by ∼5.5% on average, and over 8.5% for chemical and 7.5% for gene names, positively affecting several biological databases utilizing this NER system, like the STRING database, with only a minor drop in recall (0.6%). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All resources are available through Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243139 and GitHub https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10289360.

Indexed as

Deep LearningComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData MiningDictionaries as TopicNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID39230709
PMCPMC11373323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.