Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230692›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

HCS-hierarchical algorithm for simulation of omics datasets.

Piotr Stomma, Witold R Rudnicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Piotr StommaFaculty of Computer Science, University of Białystok, Białystok 15-245, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-8205
Witold R RudnickiFaculty of Computer Science, University of Białystok, Białystok 15-245, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7928-4944

Funding

National Science Centre Poland UMO-2020/38/E/NZ2/00598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAnalysis of the omics data with the help of machine learning (ML) methods is limited by small sample sizes and a large number of variables. One possible approach to deal with such data is using algorithms for feature selection and reducing the dataset to include only those variables that are related to the studied phenomena. Existing simulators of the omics data were mostly developed with the goal of improving the methods for generations of high-quality data, that correspond with the highest possible fidelity to the real level of molecular markers in the biological materials. The current study aims to simulate the data on a higher level of generalization. Such datasets can then be used to perform tests of the feature selection and ML algorithms on systems that have structures mimicking those of real data, but where the ground truth may be implanted by design. They can also be used to generate contrast variables with the desired correlation structure for the feature selection.

resultsWe proposed the algorithm for the reconstruction of the omic dataset that, with high fidelity, preserves the correlation structure of the original data with a reduced number of parameters. It is based on the hierarchical clustering of variables and uses principal components of the clusters. It reproduces well topological descriptors of the correlation structure. The correlation structure of the principal components of the clusters then is used to obtain datasets with correlation structures similar to the original data but not correlated with the original variables. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and data is available at: https://github.com/p100mma/hcrs_omics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39230692
PMCPMC11373347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.