ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
The role of local ablative therapy in patients with advanced invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors for invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma: A case series.Oncology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of the lungs is a rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with a limited understanding of its prognosis, particularly in advanced stages. This study aimed to assess the prognosis of patients with advanced IMA by focusing on treatment modalities.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study evaluated 33 patients with IMAs diagnosed with advanced-stage disease or disease progression after curative treatment between 2011 and 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). OS and PFS were calculated from the date of the diagnosis of advanced IMA.
resultsThe study cohort included 13 patients at the initial advanced stage and 20 patients who progressed after curative treatment. Treatment modalities included conventional chemotherapy in 24 patients (72.7%), targeted therapy in seven (21.2%), immunotherapy in 13 (39.4%), and local ablative therapy (LAT) in 13 (39.4%). The median OS was 32 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-61.0), with LAT significantly associated with improved OS compared to non-LAT treatment (not reached vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS based on conventional chemotherapy (p = 0.396), targeted therapy (p = 0.655), or immunotherapy (p = 0.992). In multivariate analysis, LAT remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 0.125; 95% CI, 0.026-0.608; p = 0.01). PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-13.7), with no significant differences observed among the treatment modalities.
conclusionOur findings suggest that LAT may provide favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced IMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.