Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230510›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2024

Computational Synthetic Biology Enabled through JAX: A Showcase.

Olivia Gallup, Kirill Sechkar, Sebastian Towers, Harrison Steel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Generative epigenetic landscapes map the topology and topography of cell fates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia GallupUniversity of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, OX1 3PJ Oxford, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-6160
Kirill SechkarUniversity of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, OX1 3PJ Oxford, U.K.
Sebastian TowersUniversity of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, OX1 3PJ Oxford, U.K.
Harrison SteelUniversity of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, OX1 3PJ Oxford, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modeling is indispensable in synthetic biology but remains underutilized. Tackling problems, from optimizing gene networks to simulating intracellular dynamics, can be facilitated by the ever-growing body of modeling approaches, be they mechanistic, stochastic, data-driven, or AI-enabled. Thanks to progress in the AI community, robust frameworks have emerged to enable researchers to access complex computational hardware and compilation. Previously, these frameworks focused solely on deep learning, but they have been developed to the point where running different forms of computation is relatively simple, as made possible, notably, by the JAX library. Running simulations at scale on GPUs speeds up research, which compounds enable larger-scale experiments and greater usability of code. As JAX remains underexplored in computational biology, we demonstrate its utility in three example projects ranging from synthetic biology to directed evolution, each with an accompanying demonstrative Jupyter notebook. We hope that these tutorials serve to democratize the flexible scaling, faster run-times, easy GPU portability, and mathematical enhancements (such as automatic differentiation) that JAX brings, all with only minor restructuring of code.

Indexed as

SoftwareSynthetic BiologyComputational BiologyComputer SimulationcomputationalJAXmachine learningmodelingsimulationsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID39230510
PMCPMC11421211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.