ArticleACS synthetic biology2024
Computational Synthetic Biology Enabled through JAX: A Showcase.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative design of synthetic gene circuits for functional and evolutionary properties.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Article
- Generative epigenetic landscapes map the topology and topography of cell fates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Model-guided gene circuit design for engineering genetically stable cell populations in diverse applications.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical modeling is indispensable in synthetic biology but remains underutilized. Tackling problems, from optimizing gene networks to simulating intracellular dynamics, can be facilitated by the ever-growing body of modeling approaches, be they mechanistic, stochastic, data-driven, or AI-enabled. Thanks to progress in the AI community, robust frameworks have emerged to enable researchers to access complex computational hardware and compilation. Previously, these frameworks focused solely on deep learning, but they have been developed to the point where running different forms of computation is relatively simple, as made possible, notably, by the JAX library. Running simulations at scale on GPUs speeds up research, which compounds enable larger-scale experiments and greater usability of code. As JAX remains underexplored in computational biology, we demonstrate its utility in three example projects ranging from synthetic biology to directed evolution, each with an accompanying demonstrative Jupyter notebook. We hope that these tutorials serve to democratize the flexible scaling, faster run-times, easy GPU portability, and mathematical enhancements (such as automatic differentiation) that JAX brings, all with only minor restructuring of code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.