Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230457›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.

Kaitlyn M Gaynor, Briana Abrahms, Kezia R Manlove, William K Oestreich, Justine A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Expanding theory, methodology and empirical systems at the spatial-social interface.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaitlyn M GaynorDepartments of Zoology and Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5747-0543
Briana AbrahmsCenter for Ecosystem Sentinels, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-5045
Kezia R ManloveDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7200-5236
William K OestreichMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-5053
Justine A SmithDepartment of Wildlife Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-4061

Funding

David and Lucile Packard FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human disturbance is contributing to widespread, global changes in the distributions and densities of wild animals. These anthropogenic impacts on wildlife arise from multiple bottom-up and top-down pathways, including habitat loss, resource provisioning, climate change, pollution, infrastructure development, hunting and our direct presence. Animal behaviour is an important mechanism linking these disturbances to population outcomes, although these behavioural pathways are often complex and can remain obscured when different aspects of behaviour are studied in isolation from one another. The spatial-social interface provides a lens for understanding how an animal's spatial and social environments interact to determine its spatial and social phenotype (i.e. measurable characteristics of an individual), and how these phenotypes interact and feed back to reshape environments. Here, we review studies of animal behaviour at the spatial-social interface to understand and predict how human disturbance affects animal movement, distribution and intraspecific interactions, with consequences for the conservation of populations and ecosystems. By understanding the spatial-social mechanisms linking human disturbance to conservation outcomes, we can better design management interventions to mitigate undesired consequences of disturbance.This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration'.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemSocial BehaviorAnimalsAnimals, WildAnthropogenic EffectsHumansSpatial Behavioranthropocenehuman–wildlife conflictlandscape of fearmovement ecologyspatial–social interfacewildlife management

Identifiers

PMID39230457
PMCPMC11449167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.