Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230455›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Scale at the interface of spatial and social ecology.

Simona Picardi, Briana L Abrahms, Jerod A Merkle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expanding theory, methodology and empirical systems at the spatial-social interface.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Spatial-social familiarity complements the spatial-social interface: evidence from Yellowstone bison.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Baboon travel progressions as a "social spandrel" in collective animal behaviour.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simona PicardiDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho , Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2623-6623
Briana L AbrahmsDepartment of Biology, Center for Ecosystem Sentinels, University of Washington , Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-5045
Jerod A MerkleDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming , Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-1833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals simultaneously navigate spatial and social environments, and their decision-making with respect to those environments constitutes their spatial (e.g. habitat selection) and social (e.g. conspecific associations) phenotypes. The spatial-social interface is a recently introduced conceptual framework linking these components of spatial and social ecology. The spatial-social interface is inherently scale-dependent, yet it has not been integrated with the rich body of literature on ecological scale. Here, we develop a conceptual connection between the spatial-social interface and ecological scale. We propose three key innovations that incrementally build upon each other. First, the use-availability framework that underpins a large body of literature in behavioural ecology can be used in analogy to the phenotype-environment nomenclature and is transferable across the spatial and social realms. Second, both spatial and social phenotypes are hierarchical, with nested components that are linked via constraints-from the top down-or emergent properties-from the bottom up. Finally, in both the spatial and social realms, the definitions of environment and phenotype depend on the focal scale of inquiry. These conceptual innovations cast our understanding of the relationships between social and spatial dimensions of animal ecology in a new light, allowing a more holistic understanding and clearer hypothesis development for animal behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration'.

Indexed as

EcosystemSocial BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEcologyPhenotypeSocial Environmentaffiliate selectionecological hierarchiesecological scalehabitat selectionsocial behaviourspatial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39230455
PMCPMC11495407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.