ArticleJournal of virology2024
Immunogenicity and efficacy of XBB.1.5 rS vaccine against the EG.5.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Syrian hamsters.
Article in Journal of virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intranasal boosting induces variant-specific responses in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-imprinted mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identification of immunodominant T cell epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in Syrian hamsters.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026Article
- Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immune escape using antigenic cartography combined with experimental challenge studies.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Germinal center-mediated broadening of B cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 booster immunization.Science immunology · 2025Article
- Fusion protein-based COVID-19 vaccines exemplified by a chimeric vaccine based on a single fusion protein (W-PreS-O).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Defining a highly conserved B cell epitope in the receptor binding motif of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 and Environmental Changes: The Perfect Storm.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Article
- An inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on a Vero cell culture-adapted high-titer virus confers cross-protection in small animals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The continued emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants necessitates updating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines to match circulating strains. The immunogenicity and efficacy of these vaccines must be tested in pre-clinical animal models. In Syrian hamsters, we measured the humoral and cellular immune response after immunization with the nanoparticle recombinant Spike (S) protein-based COVID-19 vaccine (Novavax, Inc.). We also compared the efficacy of the updated monovalent XBB.1.5 variant vaccine with previous COVID-19 vaccines for the induction of XBB.1.5 and EG.5.1 neutralizing antibodies and protection against a challenge with the EG.5.1 variant of SARS-CoV-2. Immunization induced high levels of S-specific IgG and IgA antibody-secreting cells and antigen-specific CD4 IMPORTANCE: As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, there is a need to assess the immunogenicity and efficacy of updated vaccines against newly emerging variants in pre-clinical models such as mice and hamsters. Here, we compared the immunogenicity and efficacy between the updated XBB.1.5, the original Prototype Wuhan-1, and the bivalent Prototype + BA.5 vaccine against a challenge with the EG.5.1 Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in hamsters. The XBB.1.5 and bivalent vaccine, but not the Prototype, induced serum-neutralizing antibodies against EG.5.1, albeit the titers were higher in the XBB.1.5 immunized hamsters. The presence of neutralizing antibodies was associated with complete protection against EG.5.1 infection in the lower airways and reduced virus titers in the upper airways. Compared with the bivalent vaccine, immunization with XBB.1.5 improved viral control in the nasal turbinates. Together, our data show that the updated vaccine is immunogenic and that it offers better protection against recent variants of SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.