Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230289›Full record

ReviewmBio2024

Improving viral annotation with artificial intelligence.

Zachary N Flamholz, Charlotte Li, Libusha Kelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Automated annotation and validation of human respiratory virus sequences using VADR.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  8. Optimizing phage therapy with artificial intelligence: a perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary N FlamholzDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0129-8836
Charlotte LiDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6731-3067
Libusha KellyDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-1022

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007288 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI AKABAS, MYLES H. · 1985 to 2022
$35.6M
In Vivo Sickle Cell Vasoocclusion: Adhesion MechanismsR01HL069438 · NHLBI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI KELLY, LIBUSHA · 2001 to 2024
$9.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069438NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses of bacteria, "phages," are fundamental, poorly understood components of microbial community structure and function. Additionally, their dependence on hosts for replication positions phages as unique sensors of ecosystem features and environmental pressures. High-throughput sequencing approaches have begun to give us access to the diversity and range of phage populations in complex microbial community samples, and metagenomics is currently the primary tool with which we study phage populations. The study of phages by metagenomic sequencing, however, is fundamentally limited by viral diversity, which results in the vast majority of viral genomes and metagenome-annotated genomes lacking annotation. To harness bacteriophages for applications in human and environmental health and disease, we need new methods to organize and annotate viral sequence diversity. We recently demonstrated that methods that leverage self-supervised representation learning can supplement statistical sequence representations for remote viral protein homology detection in the ocean virome and propose that consideration of the functional content of viral sequences allows for the identification of similarity in otherwise sequence-diverse viruses and viral-like elements for biological discovery. In this review, we describe the potential and pitfalls of large language models for viral annotation. We describe the need for new approaches to annotate viral sequences in metagenomes, the fundamentals of what protein language models are and how one can use them for sequence annotation, the strengths and weaknesses of these models, and future directions toward developing better models for viral annotation more broadly.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBacteriophagesGenome, ViralMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomeartificial intelligencebacteriophagecomputational biologyprotein language models

Identifiers

PMID39230289
PMCPMC11481560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.