Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230058›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2024

The efficacy and functional consequences of interactions between human spermatozoa and seminal fluid extracellular vesicles.

Cottrell T Tamessar, Amanda L Anderson, Elizabeth G Bromfield, Natalie A Trigg, Shanmathi Parameswaran, Simone J Stanger, Judith Weidenhofer, Hui-Ming Zhang, Sarah A Robertson, David J Sharkey and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cottrell T TamessarSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-7414
Amanda L AndersonSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth G BromfieldSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Natalie A TriggSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-5731
Shanmathi ParameswaranSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Simone J StangerSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Judith WeidenhoferSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia.
Hui-Ming ZhangCentral Analytical Facility, Research and Innovation Division, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah A RobertsonThe Robinson Research Institute and School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-0084
David J SharkeyThe Robinson Research Institute and School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4831-7950
Brett NixonSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-8188
John E SchjenkenSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-6160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Seminal fluid extracellular vesicles (SFEVs) have previously been shown to interact with spermatozoa and influence their fertilisation capacity. Here, we sought to extend these studies by exploring the functional consequences of SFEV interactions with human spermatozoa. SFEVs were isolated from the seminal fluid of normozoospermic donors prior to assessing the kinetics of sperm-SFEV binding in vitro, as well as the effects of these interactions on sperm capacitation, acrosomal exocytosis, and motility profile. Biotin-labelled SFEV proteins were transferred primarily to the flagellum of spermatozoa within minutes of co-incubation, although additional foci of SFEV biotinylated proteins also labelled the mid-piece and head domain. Functional analyses of high-quality spermatozoa collected following liquefaction revealed that SFEVs did not influence sperm motility during incubation at pH 5, yet SFEVs induced subtle increases in total and progressive motility in sperm incubated with SFEVs at pH 7. Additional investigation of sperm motility kinematic parameters revealed that SFEVs significantly decreased beat cross frequency and increased distance straight line, linearity, straightness, straight line velocity, and wobble. SFEVs did not influence sperm capacitation status or the ability of sperm to undergo acrosomal exocytosis. Functional assessment of both high- and low-quality spermatozoa collected prior to liquefaction showed limited SFEV influence, with these vesicles inducing only subtle decreases in beat cross frequency in spermatozoa of both groups. These findings raise the prospect that, aside from subtle effects on sperm motility, the encapsulated SFEV cargo may be destined for physiological targets other than the male germline, notably the female reproductive tract. Lay Summary: A male's influence over the biological processes of pregnancy extends beyond the provision of sperm. Molecular signals present in the ejaculate can influence the likelihood of pregnancy and healthy pregnancy progression, but the identity and function of these signals remain unclear. In this study, we wanted to understand if nano-sized particles present in the male ejaculate, called seminal fluid extracellular vesicles, can assist sperm in traversing the female reproductive tract to access the egg. To explore this, we isolated seminal fluid extracellular vesicles from human semen and incubated them with sperm. Our data showed that seminal fluid extracellular vesicles act to transfer molecular information to sperm, but this resulted in only subtle changes to the movement of sperm.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesSemenSpermatozoaSperm CapacitationSperm MotilityAcrosome ReactionHumansMaleSeminal Vesiclesextracellular vesiclesfertilityseminal fluidspermatozoasperm capacitationsperm motility

Identifiers

PMID39230058
PMCPMC11466262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.