Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39230049›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Autonomic modulation impacts conduction velocity dynamics and wavefront propagation in the left atrium.

Shohreh Honarbakhsh, Caroline Roney, Caterina Vidal Horrach, Pier D Lambiase, Ross J Hunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ganglionated plexi ablation impact on atrial fibrillation mechanisms and outcomes in patients with low scar burden.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shohreh HonarbakhshQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-5739
Caroline RoneyQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-0928
Caterina Vidal HorrachQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Pier D LambiaseElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-9267
Ross J HunterElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4641-3279

Funding

BHF Clinical Intermediate FS/ICRF/22/26034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAtrial fibrosis and autonomic remodelling are proposed pathophysiological mechanisms in atrial fibrillation (AF). Their impact on conduction velocity (CV) dynamics and wavefront propagation was evaluated. METHODS AND

resultsLocal activation times (LATs), voltage, and geometry data were obtained from patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. LATs were obtained at three pacing intervals (PIs) in sinus rhythm (SR). LATs were used to determine CV dynamics and their relationship to local voltage amplitude. The impact of autonomic modulation- pharmacologically and with ganglionated plexi (GP) stimulation, on CV dynamics, wavefront propagation, and pivot points (change in wavefront propagation of ≥90°) was determined in SR. Fifty-four patients were included. Voltage impacted CV dynamics whereby at non-low voltage zones (LVZs) (≥0.5 mV) the CV restitution curves are steeper [0.03 ± 0.03 m/s ΔCV PI 600-400 ms (PI1), 0.54 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI 400-250 ms (PI2)], broader at LVZ (0.2-0.49 mV) (0.17 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.25 ± 0.11 m/s ΔCV PI2), and flat at very LVZ (<0.2 mV) (0.03 ± 0.01 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.04 ± 0.02 m/s ΔCV PI2). Atropine did not change CV dynamics, while isoprenaline and GP stimulation resulted in greater CV slowing with rate. Isoprenaline (2.7 ± 1.1 increase/patient) and GP stimulation (2.8 ± 1.3 increase/patient) promoted CV heterogeneity, i.e. rate-dependent CV (RDCV) slowing sites. Most pivot points co-located to RDCV slowing sites (80.2%). Isoprenaline (1.3 ± 1.1 pivot increase/patient) and GP stimulation (1.5 ± 1.1 increase/patient) also enhanced the number of pivot points identified.

conclusionAtrial CV dynamics is affected by fibrosis burden and influenced by autonomic modulation which enhances CV heterogeneity and distribution of pivot points. This study provides further insight into the impact of autonomic remodelling in AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationFibrosisHeart AtriaAction PotentialsAgedAtrial Function, LeftAtrial RemodelingAtropineAutonomic Nervous SystemCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansIsoproterenolAtropineIsoproterenolAtrial fibrillationAutonomic modulationConduction velocityFunctional remodellingGanglionated plexiPivot pointsScar

Identifiers

PMID39230049
PMCPMC11372476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.