Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229961›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2024

Monitoring of myocardial injury by serial measurements of QRS area and T area: The MaastrICCht cohort.

M A Ghossein, J W T M de Kok, F Eerenberg, F van Rosmalen, R Boereboom, F Duisberg, K Verharen, J E M Sels, T Delnoij, Z Geyik and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Monitoring of myocardial injury by serial measurements of QRS area and T area: The MaastrICCht cohort.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

M A GhosseinCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-8167
J W T M de KokCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F EerenbergCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-3500-549X
F van RosmalenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R BoereboomDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F DuisbergDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
K VerharenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J E M SelsCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
T DelnoijDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-7613
Z GeyikDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A M A MingelsCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S J R MeexCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S M J van KuijkClinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A M W van StipdonkCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C GhosseinCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F W PrinzenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
I C C van der HorstCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-8522
K VernooyCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-5964
B C T van BusselCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1621-7848
R G H DriessenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8287-6166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManually derived electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters were not associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in earlier studies, while increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were. To provide evidence for vectorcardiography (VCG) measures as potential cardiac monitoring tool, we investigated VCG trajectories during critical illness.

methodsAll mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were included in the Maastricht Intensive Care Covid Cohort between March 2020 and October 2021. Serum hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP concentrations were measured daily. Conversion of daily 12-lead ECGs to VCGs by a MATLAB-based script provided QRS area, T area, maximal QRS amplitude, and QRS duration. Linear mixed-effect models investigated trajectories in serum and VCG markers over time between non-survivors and survivors, adjusted for confounders.

resultsIn 322 patients, 5461 hs-cTnT, 5435 NT-proBNP concentrations and 3280 ECGs and VCGs were analyzed. Non-survivors had higher hs-cTnT concentrations at intubation and both hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP significantly increased compared with survivors. In non-survivors, the following VCG parameters decreased more when compared to survivors: QRS area (-0.27 (95% CI) (-0.37 to -0.16, p < .01) μVs per day), T area (-0.39 (-0.62 to -0.16, p < .01) μVs per day), and maximal QRS amplitude (-0.01 (-0.01 to -0.01, p < .01) mV per day). QRS duration did not differ.

conclusionVCG-derived QRS area and T area decreased in non-survivors compared with survivors, suggesting that an increase in myocardial damage and tissue loss play a role in the course of critical illness and may drive mortality. These VCG markers may be used to monitor critically ill patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19ElectrocardiographyPeptide FragmentsTroponin TVectorcardiographyAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNetherlandsRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2BiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Troponin Telectrocardiogramintensive care monitoringmyocardial injuryserialvectorcardiogram

Identifiers

PMID39229961
PMCPMC11372660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.