Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2024
Comparison of alveolar bone morphology after expansion with hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders.
Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The three-dimensional influence and clinical significance of anterior traction with rapid expansion during dental replacement.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the buccal and palatal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth produced by hybrid hyrax (HH) and conventional hyrax (CH) expanders in growing patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsA sample of 32 patients with posterior crossbites in the late mixed dentition was recruited and randomly allocated into two groups. Group HH was composed of 18 individuals with a mean age of 10.7 years (six female, 12 male) treated with a hybrid expander with two anterior parasagittal miniscrews. Group CH was composed of 14 individuals with a mean age of 11.4 years (six female, eight male) treated with a conventional Hyrax expander. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were obtained before expansion (T1) and after 11 months when the expander was removed (T2). Buccal and palatal bone plate thickness and height of maxillary posterior teeth were measured. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney tests (P < .05).
resultsThe CH group showed greater decreases of the buccal bone plate height (mean change: 1.27 mm) at the maxillary first premolars compared to the HH group (mean change: 0.11 mm, P = .001). No intergroup difference was found for changes in the buccal and palatal bone thickness.
conclusionsHybrid expanders showed a tendency to cause less negative impact on the buccal bone plate height of first premolars compared to conventional Hyrax expanders. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Both hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders are safe for the alveolar bone morphology in the late mixed dentition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.