Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229813›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of psychology2025

Daily within-fluctuations in need frustration and implications for employee recovery and well-being: A mixed-methods study.

Anja H Olafsen, Miika Kujanpää, Marte Bentzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja H OlafsenSchool of Business, University of South-Eastern, Notodden, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-5747
Miika KujanpääSchool of Business, University of South-Eastern, Notodden, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-4787
Marte BentzenNorwegian School of Sport Sciences, School of Business, University of South-Eastern, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-1302

Funding

Research Council of Norway 301316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDaily variations in frustration of basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) have received limited attention. This mixed-methods study examines such daily variations and their relations to recovery from work and employee well-being.

methodThe study uses multilevel modeling of repeated measures through daily surveys from a period of 8 working days across 2 consecutive weeks, combined with in-depth interviews. A sample of 54 Norwegian health-care workers completed a total of 242 daily surveys, and follow-up interviews were conducted with 10 participants.

resultsQuantitative results showed that need frustration at work fluctuates from day to day, with competence frustration notably impairing recovery (i.e., lower psychological detachment and relaxation) and increasing ill-being (i.e., higher exhaustion and negative work affect). Autonomy frustration was related to increased exhaustion and sleep complaints, while relatedness frustration showed no significant relation to recovery, ill-being, or sleep. Qualitative findings corroborated and expanded on these results, offering deepened insights into how competence and, sometimes, relatedness need frustration hampered the recovery process and sleep.

conclusionThe results of the current study add to the scarce body of literature on daily fluctuations in need frustration at work and its adverse consequences.

Indexed as

EmploymentFrustrationHealth PersonnelPersonal AutonomyPersonal SatisfactionAdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayBasic psychological need frustrationdaily diaryemployee well‐beingmixed‐methodsrecovery from workself‐determination theory

Identifiers

PMID39229813
PMCPMC11735253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.