Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229630›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2024

Novel Antibody-Drug-Conjugates in Routine Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Adherence, Efficacy and Tolerability - Real-World Data from German Breast Centers.

Henning Schäffler, Dorothee Jakob, Sophia Huesmann, Kerstin Pfister, Kristina Veselinovic, Fabienne Schochter, Elena Leinert, Visnja Fink, Brigitte Rack, Alexander Englisch and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Henning SchäfflerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dorothee JakobDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sophia HuesmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Kerstin PfisterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Kristina VeselinovicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Fabienne SchochterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Visnja FinkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Brigitte RackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Alexander EnglischDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Lea-Louise VolmerDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Tobias EnglerDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Marie Louise FrevertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ingolf Juhasz-BössDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sara BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Sabine HeubleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas HartkopfDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.
Dominik DannehlDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The third-generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG), recently obtained approval for metastatic breast cancer treatment across various subtypes and therapeutic contexts. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, multicentric study evaluated real-world tolerability, feasibility and efficacy in a pre-treated, real-world cohort at three major German breast cancer centers. Results: 125 patients treated with T-DXd or SG from November 2020 to June 2023 were included (T-DXd: 77 patients; SG: 48 patients). The median treatment duration was 6.0 months for T-DXd and 3.5 months for SG therapy, with a median follow-up duration of 10.4 months for T-DXd (95% CI: 8.4-11.6) and 11.8 months for SG (95% CI: 8.0-14.4). Severe neutropenia (CTC ≥ III°) occurred in 33.3% during SG therapy, with a numerical reduction observed following primary, prophylactic use of G-CSF. T-DXd-associated pneumonitis occurred in 8 out of 77 patients (10.4 %). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.8-12.4) with T-DXd (HER2+: 10.8; HER2-low: 4.7) and 4.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-6.3) with SG (TNBC 4.9; HR+/HER2-: not reached). Median overall survival (OS) was 23.8 months (95% CI: 16.1-not estimable) with T-DXd (HER2+: 27.1; HER2-low: not reached), and 12.4 months (95% CI: 8.7-not estimable) with SG therapy (TNBC: 12.4, HR+/HER2-: not reached). 95.7% of the protocol-specified, therapeutic dose was administered for T-DXd and 89.6% for SG. Conclusion: Overall, this indicates good feasibility, tolerability, and effectiveness of ADC therapies in the real-world setting.

Indexed as

ADCsbreast canceroncologyreal-world evidencesacituzumab govitecansystemic therapytrastuzumab deruxtecan

Identifiers

PMID39229630
PMCPMC11368468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.