Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229564›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024

Randomized, controlled, multi-center phase II study of postoperative enoxaparin treatment for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancies.

Go Shinke, Yutaka Takeda, Yoshiaki Ohmura, Shogo Kobayashi, Hiroshi Wada, Osakuni Morimoto, Akira Tomokuni, Junzo Shimizu, Tadafumi Asaoka, Masahiro Tanemura and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Go ShinkeDepartment of Surgery Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-6378
Yutaka TakedaDepartment of Surgery Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki Hyogo Japan.
Yoshiaki OhmuraDepartment of Surgery Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki Hyogo Japan.
Shogo KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-7833
Osakuni MorimotoDepartment of Surgery JCHO Osaka Hospital Osaka Japan.
Akira TomokuniDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8014-6506
Junzo ShimizuDepartment of Surgery Toyonaka Municipal Hospital Toyonaka Osaka Japan.
Tadafumi AsaokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka Police Hospital Osaka Japan.
Masahiro TanemuraDepartment of Surgery Rinku General Medical Center Izumisano Osaka Japan.
Takehiro NodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-5783
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-1129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is pronounced after abdominal cancer surgery. Enoxaparin shows promise in preventing VTE in gastrointestinal, gynecological, and urological cancers, but its application after surgery for hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancy has been under-evaluated due to bleeding concerns. We confirmed the safety of enoxaparin administration in patients undergoing curative hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery for malignancies in a prospective, multi-center, phase I study. Methods: The study was conducted from April 2015 to May 2021 across eight specialized centers. Patients ( Results: The full analysis set included 259 patients (131 control, 129 enoxaparin). The per-protocol population included 233 patients (117 control, 116 enoxaparin). Most cases were hepatic malignancies (111 control, 111 enoxaparin). The median administration duration of enoxaparin was 7 days, with 92% receiving 4000 units/day. Despite a reduction in the relative risk (RR) of VTE due to postoperative enoxaparin administration, the results were not significant (control: four cases, 3.4% vs. treatment: two cases, 1.7%; RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.09-2.70; Conclusions: The perioperative administration of enoxaparin in hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancies is feasible and safe. However, further case accumulation and investigation are necessary to assess its potential in reducing the occurrence of VTE.

Indexed as

DVTenoxaparinhepatobiliary‐pancreatic malignancyPTEVTE prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39229564
PMCPMC11368486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.