ArticleHeliyon2024
The relationship between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in proximal humerus fractures.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The variability of humeral head angulation in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) is a noteworthy observation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential association between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in PHFs. Methods: We used the reconstruction function in Mimics software to generate three-dimensional models of fractures. Bony landmarks were employed to accurately define the calcar and humeral head zone. Boolean subtraction was performed to calculate the volume of head bone void. Results: The cohort consisted of 60 (74.1 %) varus, 21 (25.9 %) valgus, and 23 (22.1 %) neutral angulated PHFs. The mean percentage of humeral head bone void was 38.5 ± 17.8 in varus, 36.3 ± 15.7 in valgus, and 30.1 ± 10.6 in neutral angulated PHFs. A significant difference was observed between the varus and neutral groups (P = 0.035). In addition, an analysis of humeral head bone void was conducted among patients aged over 65 years old, revealing a mean percentage of 42.7 ± 16.4 in varus (27 cases), 34.8 ± 14.5 in valgus (13 cases), and 28.1 ± 11.8 in neutral (8 cases) angulated PHFs. The difference between the varus and neutral groups was also significant (P = 0.023). Conclusion: All types of angulation patterns exhibited humeral head bone void to some extent, with the varus-displaced PHFs demonstrating more obvious defects in comparison to the neutral angulated type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.