Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229481›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2024

Functional outcomes after retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle: Observations from a single-center experience of over 13 years.

Amir Kaywan Aftahy, Maria Goldberg, Vicki M Butenschoen, Arthur Wagner, Bernhard Meyer, Chiara Negwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir Kaywan AftahyTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.
Maria GoldbergTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.
Vicki M ButenschoenTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.
Arthur WagnerTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.
Chiara NegwerTechnical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Neurosurgery, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accessing the posterior base of the skull is complex because of the vital neurovascular structures in the area. However, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) offers a solution to this challenge. Research question: To analyze surgical outcome of RSA. Material and methods: This study involved a retrospective review of patient charts from a single center, focusing on the surgical procedure and outcomes following the operation. Results: The study included 517 patients suffering from conditions like vestibular schwannomas (VS), metastatic cancers, and trigeminal neuralgia. The most frequent symptoms reported were balance disorders (42.7%), hearing loss (36.5%), walking difficulties (21.2%), headaches (18.9%), facial pain (17.1%), issues with trigeminal nerve function (14.1%), cerebellar dysfunction (13.5%), and facial nerve paralysis (10.2%). The rate of complications stood at 21.1%, with 11.3% of patients needing revision surgery. The median score on the Clavien-Dindo scale was 2, and the rate of mortality related to surgery was 1.0%. Permanent symptom improvement was seen in 72.1% of cases. Temporary new deficits occurred in 43.2% of patients, with facial nerve paralysis being the most common (14.1%). No significant correlation was found between the size of the craniotomy and the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.155), except in the case of VS (p = 0.041). Larger craniotomy sizes were associated with higher rates of complications (p = 0.016), especially CSF leaks (p = 0.006). Complications significantly affected the likelihood and number of new deficits (p < 0.001 for both), particularly postoperative bleeding (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), CSF leaks (p = 0.026, p = 0.039), and hydrocephalus (p = 0.050, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The potential for complications related to the surgical approach cannot be overlooked. The size of the tumor should not dictate larger surgical approaches due to the associated increase in postoperative complications; a tailored approach that considers the precise tumor location and pathology is crucial for optimizing postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Cerebellopontine angleNeurosurgeryOperative techniqueRetrosigmoid approachSkull base surgery

Identifiers

PMID39229481
PMCPMC11369374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.