ArticleCureus2024
The Learning Curve in Digital Replant Surgery: 46 Prospectively Collected Cases From a Single Surgeon Over a 10-Year Period.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proficiency and Difficulty Scoring Tools for Finger Replantation.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDigital replantation is a technically difficult microsurgery requiring significant surgical skill. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative outcomes associated with the surgical learning curve for microvascular digital replantation.
methodsA prospectively maintained surgical database of consecutive patients who underwent digital replantation from 2002 to 2012 was reviewed. All cases were performed by a single surgeon and began immediately after the surgeon's fellowship. A total of 46 patients were identified. Outcomes of digital replantation were tested for association with time since fellowship, total microvascular operative experience, and location and type of injury.
resultsOverall, 38/46 (82.6%) of patients underwent a successful digital replantation. There was a significant difference between survival percentages over the years (p=0.04), with improvement seen over time. Total microvascular experience was significantly associated with successful outcomes (p<0.001). After 100 hours of microvascular experience, there was a significant increase in the survival odds ratio (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.5-47.9). Crush and thumb injuries were more likely to have detrimental outcomes.
conclusionsThere was marked improvement in replant survival over time, with a significant increase in odds of survival after 100 hours of microvascular experience. One hundred operating hours under the microscope occurred around 2 years in practice for this high-volume surgeon. There is strong evidence that a steep learning curve occurs in microvascular digit replantation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.