ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Comprehensive landscapes of the causal network between immunity and sarcopenia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The causal effects of immune factors on sarcopenia-related phenotypes.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Sarcopenia in breast cancer: prognostic values and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Sarcopenia independently predicts acute cholecystitis in older patients with gallstones: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Role of IL-16 in age-related skeletal muscle atrophy: an integrated study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Observational
- The relationships between Life's Crucial 9, Life's Essential 8, and sarcopenia in older adults: multicenter case-control study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Bacterial co-infection and secondary infection in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure of coronavirus disease 2019.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammaging, an immune status characterized by a sustained increase in pro-inflammatory markers and a decline in anti-inflammatory mechanisms, is a critical risk factor in the development of sarcopenia. Landscapes of the causal relationships between immunity and sarcopenia are needed to understand the mechanism of sarcopenia and provide novel treatments comprehensively. Methods: We used Mendelian Randomization (MR) as the basic method in this study. By setting immune proteins, immune cells, and sarcopenia as exposures and outcomes alternatively, and then combining them in different directions, we potentially estimated their causal relationships and directions and subsequently mapped the comprehensive causal landscape based on this information efficiently. To further understand the network, we developed a method based on rank-sums to integrate multiple algorithms and identify the key immune cells and proteins. Results: More than 1,000 causal relationships were identified between immune cell phenotypes, proteins, and sarcopenia traits (p < 0.05), and the causal maps of these linkages were established. In the threshold of FDR < 0.05, hundreds of causal linkages were still significant. The final comprehensive map included 13 immune cell phenotypes and 8 immune proteins. The star factors in the final map included EM CD8br %CD8br, EM DN (CD4- CD8-) %DN, SIRT2, and so on. Conclusion: By reading the landscapes in this study, we may not only find the factors and the pathways that have been reported and proven but also identify multiple novel immunity cell phenotypes and proteins with enriched upstream and downstream pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.