ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Understanding responses to multi-electrode epiretinal stimulation using a biophysical model.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neural interfaces are designed to evoke specific patterns of electrical activity in populations of neurons by stimulating with many electrodes. However, currents passed simultaneously through multiple electrodes often combine nonlinearly to drive neural responses, making evoked responses difficult to predict and control. This response nonlinearity could arise from the interaction of many excitable sites in each cell, any of which can produce a spike. However, this multi-site activation hypothesis is difficult to verify experimentally. Approach: We developed a biophysical model to study retinal ganglion cell (RGC) responses to multi-electrode stimulation and validated it using data collected from Results: First, the model was validated by using it to reproduce essential empirical findings from single-electrode recording and stimulation, including recorded spike voltage waveforms at multiple locations and sigmoidal responses to injected current. Then, stimulation with two electrodes was modeled to test how the positioning of the electrodes relative to the cell affected the degree of response nonlinearity. Currents passed through pairs of electrodes positioned near the cell body or far from the axon (>40 µm) exhibited approximately linear summation in evoking spikes. Currents passed through pairs of electrodes close to the axon summed linearly when their locations along the axon were similar, and nonlinearly otherwise. Over a range of electrode placements, several distinct, localized spike initiation sites were observed, and the number of these sites covaried with the degree of response nonlinearity. Similar trends were observed for three-electrode stimuli. All of these trends in the simulation were consistent with experimental observations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.