Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39229084›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Revisiting equivalent optical properties for cerebrospinal fluid to improve diffusion-based modeling accuracy in the brain.

Aiden Vincent Lewis, Qianqian Fang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aiden Vincent LewisNortheastern University, Department of Bioengineering, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, USA, 02115.ORCID 0000-0001-6826-8925
Qianqian FangNortheastern University, Department of Bioengineering, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, USA, 02115.ORCID 0000-0003-0805-935X

Funding

Next-generation Monte Carlo eXtreme Light Transport Simulation PlatformR01GM114365 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI FANG, QIANQIAN · 2015 to 2023
$2.9M
NeuroJSON - A Scalable, Searchable and Verifiable Neuroimaging Data PlatformU24NS124027 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Qianqian Fang · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
Next-generation optical brain functional imaging platformR01EB026998 · NIBIB · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI FANG, QIANQIAN · 2018 to 2019
$870k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026998NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114365NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS124027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: The diffusion approximation (DA) is used in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies despite its known limitations due to the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Many of these studies rely on a set of empirical CSF optical properties, recommended by a previous simulation study, that were not selected for the purpose of minimizing DA modeling errors. Aim: We aim to directly quantify the accuracy of DA solutions in brain models by comparing those with the gold-standard solutions produced by the mesh-based Monte Carlo (MMC), based on which we derive updated recommendations. Approach: For both a 5-layer head and Colin27 atlas models, we obtain DA solutions by independently sweeping the CSF absorption Results: Our results suggest that previously recommended CSF properties can cause significant errors (8.7% to 52%) in multiple tested metrics. By simultaneously sweeping Conclusion: Our new recommendation of CSF equivalent optical properties can greatly reduce the model mismatches between DA and MMC solutions at multiple metrics without sacrificing computational speed. We also show that it is possible to eliminate such a mismatch for a single or a pair of metrics of interest.

Indexed as

Brain imagingCerebrospinal fluidDiffusion approximationfNIRSMonte Carlo simulationsPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

PMID39229084
PMCPMC11370459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.