ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
The 30-second chair stand test (CS30) as a predictor of exercise tolerance in elderly individuals (≥75 years) with stage A/B heart failure.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between the 30-s chair stand test and peak oxygen uptake in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing: A large retrospective internal and external validation study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Preoperative exercise capacity as a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with esophageal cancer: a multicenter observational cohort study.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Multimorbidity patterns and 15-year trajectories of physical performance: a population-based study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting exercise intolerance in elderly individuals with heart failure using the 30-second chair stand test.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Japan, the number of very elderly individuals with heart failure (HF) is on the rise. One indicator of HF stage progression is a decrease in exercise tolerance (ET). While peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is the gold standard for ET assessment, the wide-scale applicability of CPX is constrained owing to expensive equipment and challenges in this population. The 30-second chair stand test (CS30), a simple and quick alternative, is widely used among community-dwelling elderly individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CS30 is a predictor of ET in elderly individuals with stage A/B HF. Methods: Of 748 outpatients aged 75 years and over who visited our center between March 2021 and December 2022, 493 patients (296 males and 197 females) were included in this study. CS30 was measured using a seat height of 40 cm, and peak VO₂ was assessed using CPX. Results: The findings showed a statistically significant positive association between CS30 and peak VO₂ for both males and females (males: β = 0.255, 95 % CI = 0.102-0.407; females: β = 0.282, 95 % CI = 0.043-0.521). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed moderate accuracy of CS30 in predicting low ET in both sexes (males AUC = 0.740, 95 % CI = 0.640-0.841, p < 0.001; females AUC = 0.725, 95 % CI = 0.644-0.807, p < 0.001). The cut-off values of CS30 were established as 18 times for males and 16 times for females. Conclusions: CS30 is a potentially convenient method for estimating current ET in older adults, providing a feasible alternative to CPX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.