ArticleRegenerative therapy2024
Long-term prognosis and DNA damage status after oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet transplantation following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for squamous cell carcinoma: A case series.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet (AOMECS) transplantation has recently been applied in human patients to prevent postprocedural stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the long-term safety of AOMECS transplantation remains unclear. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of 10 patients who participated in a clinical trial of AOMECS transplantation after esophageal ESD. Additionally, we assessed the local DNA damage response in the esophageal epithelium using p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) immunofluorescence in post-AOMECS biopsy specimens. The median follow-up period was 118.5 months (range: 46-130 months). Two patients developed primary esophageal cancer near the AOMECS site and successfully underwent additional ESD. One patient developed lymph node metastasis and underwent chemotherapy. None of the patients died from the original disease, although one patient died from unrelated causes. The rate of abnormal 53BP1 nuclear foci, indicative of increased genome instability, increased with the progression of neoplasia in patients post AOMECS. Our case series suggests that AOMECS transplantation provides an acceptable long-term prognosis and 53BP1 foci may serve as a useful marker for assessing DNA instability in the post-AOMECS esophageal epithelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.