Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228806›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Quality improvement in neonatal care through enhanced patient safety and clinical risk management: a before-and-after study about neonatal sepsis.

Davide Ferorelli, Vito Maria Goffredo, Elena Graziano, Maurizio Mastrapasqua, Michele Telegrafo, Annachiara Vinci, Paolo Visci, Marcello Benevento, Fiorenza Zotti, Alessandra Foglianese and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Davide FerorelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Vito Maria GoffredoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Elena GrazianoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Maurizio MastrapasquaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Michele TelegrafoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Annachiara VinciInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Paolo VisciInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Marcello BeneventoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Fiorenza ZottiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Alessandra FoglianeseDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Raffaella PanzaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Biagio SolarinoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Alessandro Dell'ErbaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Nicola LaforgiaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), Section of Legal Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal sepsis, classified into early-onset and late-onset based on symptom timing, poses significant risks of morbidity and mortality, especially in low birth weight infants. Effective clinical risk management protocols are crucial in reducing these risks. Methods: This before-and-after study evaluated the impact of a newly implemented clinical risk management protocol in the Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Policlinico Hospital-University of Bari. The study included 399 neonates over three years, comparing pre- and post-protocol outcomes. Data collection focused on maternal and neonatal demographics, infection rates, and hospital stay lengths. Statistical analysis included Results: The study found no significant differences in neonatal pathologies or demographics between pre- and post-protocol groups. However, post-protocol implementation showed a notable reduction in umbilical venous catheter (UVC) infections ( Discussion: The findings underscore the effectiveness of structured clinical risk management protocols in enhancing neonatal outcomes, particularly in reducing specific infection risks. Despite the study's limitations, including its observational nature and sample size, the results advocate for broader adoption and further research on these protocols in diverse healthcare settings. The positive outcomes highlight the importance of continuous clinical risk management efforts in high-risk neonatal environments.

Indexed as

clinical risk managementneonatal careneonatal sepsispatient safetyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39228806
PMCPMC11370662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.