ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Slanted and Standard Lateral Rectus Recession Procedures for Convergence Insufficiency-Type Intermittent Exotropia in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of slanted lateral rectus recession on pediatric patients with convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR-rec) for treating convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-IXT) in children. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 26 patients aged <16 years with CI-IXT who underwent BLR-rec between August 2016 and July 2021 with six months of follow-up data post-surgery were classified into slanted BLR-rec group (n = 14) and standard BLR-rec group (n = 12; equal-length recession of the upper and lower horns of the LR muscle). Surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: In the slanted and standard groups, the preoperative distance exodeviation was 27.9 ± 5.5 and 30.8 ± 10.0 prism diopter (PD) (p = 0.63), near exodeviation was 41.1 ± 5.6 and 42.9 ± 9.2 PD (p = 0.75), and difference between near and distance deviation (N-D deviation difference) was 13.2 ± 3.2 and 12.1 ± 3.3 PD (p = 0.30), respectively. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative N-D deviation difference was compared between the slanted BLR and standard BLR groups at six months postoperatively. The results revealed that the ratio for slanted-BLR was 0.44 ± 0.19, and for standard-BLR was 0.84 ± 0.24. In the standard group, stereoacuity remained unchanged post-surgery compared to that pre-surgery, while the slanted group showed significant improvement (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Conclusion: Compared with the standard BLR-rec procedure, the slanted BLR-rec procedure reduced N-D deviation differences in CI-IXT, positively impacting gross stereopsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.