ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Sarcopenia and frailty among the elderly population in the community: An observational study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and diagnostic variability of sarcopenia in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: There are few studies on the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in India. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess sarcopenia and frailty using simple clinical tools among the elderly population in the community. Settings and Design: This was an observational study. The elderly population with an age group of >60 years residing in villages within 10-15 km of Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, formed the sampling frame of the study. Methods and Material: A total of 785 participants were approached, of whom 556 were included in the study based on inclusion criteria. Participants were assessed for grip strength, muscle mass, gait speed, and frailty. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using STATA-IC statistical software version 13. A nonparametric Chi-square (χ2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent-samples Results: Based on the Indian criteria, 205 participants (36.1%) were diagnosed as having sarcopenia, and 351 participants (63%) were diagnosed as having "no sarcopenia." 5.6% of participants were found to be frail, 19.2% to be pre-frailty, and 75.2% to be no frailty. The χ Conclusions: In this study, 36.9% of the elderly participants were found to have "sarcopenia," and 5.6% of the participants had frailty. Simple clinical tools used were easy to administer and suitable for field screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.