ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Assessment of the services provided at the family medicine staff clinics in King Saud Medical City, Riyadh.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction is the subjective evaluation of a patient's cognitive and emotional responses. This reflects their expectations regarding the ideal healthcare to be provided. This study aims to assess the satisfaction level of the attendees to the family medicine staff clinics at King Saud Medical City, Riyadh. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study recruited 378 participants. An adapted and piloted questionnaire was used to gather the data. The questionnaire enquires about the communication skills of the receptionist, the triage nurse, and the assigned physician. It included questions regarding the structure of the clinics. Results: Females represent the majority of about 255 (67.5%). About 2/3 of the respondents were within the age group of 18-34 years, 245 (64.8%). A high level of satisfaction was reported by the participants regarding the professionalism, kindness, interest of the staff member, and waiting time. Gender, marital status, and age group have no significant effect on the satisfaction level; the Conclusion: The result of this study identified high satisfaction responses regarding the communication skills of the receptionist, triage nurse, and physicians. The overall evaluation of the experience during staff clinic visits was satisfactory. Periodic evaluation of these attributes and other indicators that promote patient-centered care should be undertaken to improve the overall quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.