Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228464›Full record

ReviewAustralian prescriber2024

Utility of common investigations for suspected inflammatory arthritis in adults.

Nicola Cook, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian prescriber, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicola CookWestern Rheumatology Perth.
Rachelle BuchbinderWestern Rheumatology Perth.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-0933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory arthritis may be the principal feature or one component of an inflammatory rheumatological disease. It is a clinical diagnosis, principally made based on the patient's history and examination. Specific investigations, such as rheumatoid factor and human leucocyte antigen B27 gene, may support the diagnosis in the context of a suggestive clinical presentation, but a diagnosis cannot be made based on these tests alone because positive results may also be seen in healthy individuals. To reduce the likelihood of false positive results, laboratory and radiological investigations should be tailored to the suspected diagnosis based on pretest probability. While musculoskeletal symptoms are a common presentation in general practice, specific features that increase suspicion of an inflammatory arthritis include prolonged morning stiffness (more than 1 hour) that is improved by exercise or movement. A broad 'rheumatological panel' increases the likelihood of false positive results and should be avoided to prevent unnecessary further investigations and treatment, and unwarranted anxiety in both the patient and the doctor.

Indexed as

autoantibodiesdiagnostic testsinflammatory arthritisoverdiagnosispretest probabilityrheumatoid factor

Identifiers

PMID39228464
PMCPMC11368532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.