ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
A Full-wave Solution of Deep Sources in the Lossy Human Head to Accurate Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Currents in the brain flow inside neurons and across their boundaries into the extracellular medium, create electric and magnetic fields. These fields, which contain suitable information on brain activity, can be measured by electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and direct neural imaging. Methods: In this paper, we employed an electromagnetic model of the neuron activity and human head to derive electric and magnetic fields (brain waves) using a full-wave approach (ie. without any approximation). Currently, the brain waves are only derived using the quasi-static approximation (QSA) of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory. Results: As a result, source localization in brain imaging will produce some errors. So far, the error rate of the QSA on the output results of electric and magnetic fields has not been investigated. This issue has become more noticeable due to the increased sensitivity of modern electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) devices. This work introduces issues that QSA encounters in this problem and reveals the necessity of a full-wave solution. Then, a full-wave solution of the problem in closed-form format is presented for the first time. This solution is done in two scenarios: the source (active neurons) is in the center of a sphere, and when the source is out of the center but deeply inside the sphere. The first scenario is simpler, but the second one is much more complicated and is solved using a partial-wave series expression. Conclusion: One of the significant achievements of this model is improving the interpretation of EEG and MEG measurements, resulting in more accurate source localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.