ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
A Novel Approach for Mucosal and Bulbar Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Isolation Based on the Non-adherent Subculture Technique.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Optimized Conversion of Spermatogonial Stem Cells Into Spinal Cord Neurons Enhances Functional Recovery in Rats After Spinal Cord Injury.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are widely used in transplantation studies. The high purification of this unique cell type is valuable for medical applications. Although recent improvements in OECs isolation procedures opened a new era in this field, the high purification efficacy and viability rate are still of concern. The most widely used OECs isolation techniques can be broadly classified based on adherence properties, particularly in olfactory bulb-derived OEC isolation. Considering the invasive nature of harvesting OECs from human olfactory bulbs, a highly efficient purification of these cells from olfactory mucosa can benefit clinical trials. In this study, we isolated OECs from rats' olfactory bulbs and mucosa due to their differential adherence properties and compared them. Methods: Cell preparations were characterized by NGFR p75 and S100β antibodies, the specific markers for OECs, using immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis, respectively. OECs morphology and viability were monitored over time by microscopy and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Results: We found that OECs could be purified from the olfactory mucosa using our suggested method as efficiently as the olfactory bulb. Both derived OECs showed high levels of NGFR p75 and S100β expression, although the S100β expression was higher in olfactory mucosa-derived OECs preparations (P<0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two sources in cell viability in our suggested protocol. Conclusion: Due to the non-invasive harvesting method, olfactory mucosa-derived OECs are preferred from a clinical point of view in transplantation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.