ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Analysis of the Radial Forearm Phalloplasty Donor Site: Do Dermal Matrices Improve Donor Site Morbidity?
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the Versatility of the Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Using a Simultaneously Pre-expanded Adjacent Flap for Primary Donor-Site Closure and Algorithm for Preoperative Decision-Making.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Staged phalloplasty in a transgender male: a complex case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- MANAGEMENT OF GENDER-AFFIRMING PATIENTS - A PLASTIC SURGERY PERSPECTIVE.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The radial forearm free flap is frequently chosen for phalloplasty; however, flap size required for phalloplasty is associated with a large scar burden and functional concerns. We sought to investigate donor site functionality, aesthetics, and volume deficits in a cohort of individuals who underwent radial forearm phalloplasty (RFP) with donor site skin grafting alone or dermal substitute and subsequent skin grafting. Methods: Donor site functionality was assessed using the quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH). Patient- and clinician-reported aesthetics were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). An Artec Leo three-dimensional scanner was used to measure volumetric differences from the donor site forearm and contralateral forearm. Results: Fifteen patients who underwent RFP agreed to participate. No statistically significant differences were identified between different donor site closure methods regarding qDASH, patient-reported POSAS, or total volumetric deficits. A blinded clinician reported that POSAS approached significance at 4.7 for biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM), 4.2 for Integra, and 3.0 for split-thickness skin graft ( Conclusions: The addition of dermal matrix (BTM or Integra) to the treatment algorithm for RFP did not show statistically significant improvement in donor site volume deficits, patient-reported scar appearance (POSAS), or functionality (qDASH).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.