Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228386›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2024

Differential effects of TLR3 and TLR4 activation on MSC-mediated immune regulation.

Urvashi Kaundal, Aruna Rakha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Urvashi KaundalDepartment of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Aruna RakhaScleroderma Genomics and Health Disparities Unit, NIAMS, NIH, Bethesda, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have evolved as an invaluable therapeutic cell type due to their broad therapeutic properties. Bone marrow-derived MSCs are currently being applied in numerous clinical trials, and the initial results have been encouraging. However, heterogeneous responsiveness amongst patients is also being experienced; therefore, the efficacy of MSCs

Indexed as

B cellsConditioned mediumCytokinesMesenchymal stromal cellsT cellsToll-like receptors

Identifiers

PMID39228386
PMCPMC11369377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.