ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Fundamental Patterns of Structural Evolution Revealed by Chromosome-Length Genomes of Cactophilic Drosophila.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of the reproductive interactome and the origins of postmating-prezygotic reproductive divergence.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Transposable elements contribute to the evolution of host shift-related genes in cactophilicGenome research · 2026Article
- Sex-biased Expression of Genes and Transposable Elements in Hybrids from Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A catalog of mRNAs transferred from males to females during mating in Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Recently Evolved, Stage-Specific Genes Are Enriched at Life-Stage Transitions in Flies.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025Article
- Olfactory variation among closely related cactophilic Drosophila species.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of adaptation and speciation requires model organisms with both a history of ecological and phenotypic study as well as a complete set of genomic resources. In particular, high-quality genome assemblies of ecological model organisms are needed to assess the evolution of genome structure and its role in adaptation and speciation. Here, we generate new genomes of cactophilic Drosophila, a crucial model clade for understanding speciation and ecological adaptation in xeric environments. We generated chromosome-level genome assemblies and complete annotations for seven populations across Drosophila mojavensis, Drosophila arizonae, and Drosophila navojoa. We use these data first to establish the most robust phylogeny for this clade to date, and to assess patterns of molecular evolution across the phylogeny, showing concordance with a priori hypotheses regarding adaptive genes in this system. We then show that structural evolution occurs at constant rate across the phylogeny, varies by chromosome, and is correlated with molecular evolution. These results advance the understanding of the D. mojavensis clade by demonstrating core evolutionary genetic patterns and integrating those patterns to generate new gene-level hypotheses regarding adaptation. Our data are presented in a new public database (cactusflybase.arizona.edu), providing one of the most in-depth resources for the analysis of inter- and intraspecific evolutionary genomic data. Furthermore, we anticipate that the patterns of structural evolution identified here will serve as a baseline for future comparative studies to identify the factors that influence the evolution of genome structure across taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.