Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228261›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Contact-Map-Driven Exploration of Heterogeneous Protein-Folding Paths.

Ziad Fakhoury, Gabriele C Sosso, Scott Habershon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziad FakhouryDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Gabriele C SossoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-7399
Scott HabershonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-6011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently shown how physically realizable protein-folding pathways can be generated using directed walks in the space of inter-residue contact-maps; combined with a back-transformation to move from protein contact-maps to Cartesian coordinates, we have demonstrated how this approach can generate protein-folding trajectory ensembles without recourse to molecular dynamics. In this article, we demonstrate that this framework can be used to study a challenging protein-folding problem that is known to exhibit two different folding paths which were previously identified through molecular dynamics simulation at several different temperatures. From the viewpoint of protein-folding mechanism prediction, this particular problem is extremely challenging to address, specifically involving folding to an identical nontrivial compact native structure along distinct pathways defined by heterogeneous secondary structural elements. Here, we show how our previously reported contact-map-based protein-folding strategy can be significantly enhanced to enable accurate and robust prediction of heterogeneous folding paths by (i) introducing a novel topologically informed metric for comparing two protein contact maps, (ii) reformulating our graph-represented folding path generation, and (iii) introducing a new and more reliable structural back-mapping algorithm. These changes improve the reliability of generating structurally sound folding intermediates and dramatically decrease the number of physically irrelevant folding intermediates generated by our previous simulation strategy. Most importantly, we demonstrate how our enhanced folding algorithm can successfully identify the alternative folding mechanisms of a multifolding-pathway protein, in line with direct molecular dynamics simulations.

Identifiers

PMID39228261
PMCPMC11428170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.