Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228196›Full record

ReviewAnnals of coloproctology2024

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula.

Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D Yagnik, G Mahak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tractWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pankaj GargDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Garg Fistula Research Institute, Panchkula, India.
Kaushik BhattacharyaDepartment of Surgery, Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College and Lions Seva Kendra Hospital, Kishanganj, India.
Vipul D YagnikDepartment of Surgery, Banas Medical College and Research Institute, Palanpur, Palanpur, India.
G MahakDepartment of Clinical Research, Garg Fistula Research Institute, Panchkula, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anal fistula can be a challenging condition to manage, with complex fistulas presenting even greater difficulties. The primary concerns in treating this condition are a risk of damage to the anal sphincters, which can compromise fecal continence, and refractoriness to treatment, as evidenced by a high recurrence rate. Furthermore, the treatment of complex anal fistula involves several additional challenges. Satisfactory solutions to many of these obstacles remain elusive, and no consensus has been established regarding the available treatment options. In summary, complex anal fistula has no established gold-standard treatment, and the quest for effective therapies continues. This review discusses and highlights groundbreaking advances in the management of complex anal fistula over the past decade.

Indexed as

FistulaMagnetic resonance imagingRectal fistulaStem cellWound healing

Identifiers

PMID39228196
PMCPMC11375234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.