Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228157›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis2025

Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.

Wenjing Guo, Jie Liu, Fan Dong, Huixiao Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenjing GuoNational Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR.
Jie LiuNational Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR.
Fan DongNational Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR.
Huixiao HongNational Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating apprehension surrounding the carcinogenic potential of chemicals emphasizes the imperative need for efficient methods of assessing carcinogenicity. Conventional experimental approaches such as in vitro and in vivo assays, albeit effective, suffer from being costly and time-consuming. In response to this challenge, new alternative methodologies, notably machine learning and deep learning techniques, have attracted attention for their potential in developing carcinogenicity prediction models. This article reviews the progress in predicting carcinogenicity using various machine learning and deep learning algorithms. A comparative analysis on these developed models reveals that support vector machine, random forest, and ensemble learning are commonly preferred for their robustness and effectiveness in predicting chemical carcinogenicity. Conversely, models based on deep learning algorithms, such as feedforward neural network, convolutional neural network, graph convolutional neural network, capsule neural network, and hybrid neural networks, exhibit promising capabilities but are limited by the size of available carcinogenicity datasets. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current machine learning and deep learning models for carcinogenicity prediction, underscoring the importance of high-quality and large datasets. These observations are anticipated to catalyze future advancements in developing effective and generalizable machine learning and deep learning models for predicting chemical carcinogenicity.

Indexed as

CarcinogensDeep LearningMachine LearningAnimalsCarcinogenicity TestsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerCarcinogensCarcinogenicitychemical carcinogendatasetsdeep learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39228157
PMCPMC12442503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.