ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Clinical guidance for cannabidiol-associated hepatotoxicity: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabidiol at the crossroads: panacea, placebo, or problem?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about medical cannabis among U.S. healthcare professionals.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- Safety of cannabidiol versus placebo in healthy population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Exploring Cannabinoid Effects Using Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Cannabidiol (CBD) as a potential therapeutic agent for liver cancer: a comprehensive review of current evidence.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Clinical guidance for cannabidiol-associated hepatotoxicity: A narrative review.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that cannabidiol (CBD) use is associated with clinically significant liver enzyme (LE) elevations and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The proportion of LE elevations and DILI events reported in the literature meet the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' (CIOMS) classification of a common adverse drug reaction. However, these potential adverse events are unknown to many clinicians and may be overlooked. The increasing use of CBD for both medical and non-medical use necessitates clear direction in the diagnosis and management of CBD-associated hepatotoxicity. To our knowledge, no such clinical guidance currently exists. For people presenting with elevated LEs, CBD use should be screened for and be considered in the differential diagnosis. This narrative review will provide clinicians with guidance in the prevention, detection, and management of CBD-related hepatotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.