ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Midterm outcome after surgical correction of an anomaly of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New insight into anomalies of coronary arteries in children: diagnosis, treatment with perioperative and postoperative course and prognosis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to present the midterm outcomes of surgical correction of the anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA).
methodsThis is a retrospective study of patients undergoing anomalous origin of the LCA from the pulmonary artery repair between 2010 and 2019.
resultsForty-nine patients (20 boys and 29 girls) underwent ALCAPA repair. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age at ALCAPA repair: infant (< 1 year of age: n = 24) and non-infant ( ≧ 1 year of age: n = 25). Median age at time of repair was 23 months(7-60months). LCA reimplantation was performed in 47 patients, and Takeuchi repair was performed in 2 patients. Hospital mortality in the infant group was 8.2% (4 of 49). Infant group had significantly lower LVEF in pre-operation (p < 0.05), but there was not significantly different between the two groups about LVEF at discharge. The median follow-up duration was 43(18-85)months. The freedom from reoperation was not significantly different between two groups (infants vs. non-infants: 68.8% vs. 87.5% at 10 years; p = 0.096).
conclusionsSurgical treatment of ALCAPA had an excellent early and midterm outcomes. Left ventricular dysfunction in pre-operation was the main risk of mortality in-hospital. The freedom from reoperation did not differ significantly between infant group and non-infant group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.