Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227846›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2024

Comparison of efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding non-ventilated lung collapse in uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.

Yulin Li, Haihui Huang, Lihua Hang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660588 (Effect of Brief Bronchial Suction on the Quality of Non-Ventilated Lung Collapse and Time to Adequate Surgical Exposure During Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660588 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Brief Bronchial Suction on the Quality of Non-Ventilated Lung Collapse and Time to Adequate Surgical Exposure During Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Randomized Patient- and Surgeon-Blinded Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsLung Collapse, One-lung Ventilation, Thoracic Anesthesia, Thoracic Surgery, Video-assistedArmsbronchial suction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yulin Li *The First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, 215300, China.
Haihui Huang *The First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, 215300, China.
Lihua HangThe First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, 215300, China. zjhanglihua@foxmail.com.

Funding

Kunshan High-level Medical Talents Project Ksgccrc2004Medical Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission in 2021 M2021072Technology Innovation Project of Kunshan First People's Hospital KSKFQYLWS2023005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bronchial suction has been applied in speeding lung collapse. Low suction pressure may not speed lung collapse, but high pressure causes occult lung injury. The aim of the study was to explore efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding lung collapse.

methodsEighty-four subjects undergoing uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were randomly assigned for non-suction (Group 0), -10 cmH

resultsBoth the LCS at T

conclusionsApplying - 10 cmH

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2200062991. Registered on 26/08/2022.

Indexed as

Thoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressurePulmonary AtelectasisSuctionTreatment OutcomeBronchial blockersLung collapseOne-lung ventilationSuctionVideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39227846
PMCPMC11370308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.