Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227836›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Population structure and breed identification of Chinese indigenous sheep breeds using whole genome SNPs and InDels.

Chang-Heng Zhao, Dan Wang, Cheng Yang, Yan Chen, Jun Teng, Xin-Yi Zhang, Zhi Cao, Xian-Ming Wei, Chao Ning, Qi-En Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic architecture of insertion-deletion (indel) variants in beetal goats of India.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Survey ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chang-Heng Zhao *Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Dan Wang *Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Cheng YangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Yan ChenShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Jun TengShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Xin-Yi ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Zhi CaoShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Xian-Ming WeiShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Chao NingShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.
Qi-En YangCAS Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810001, Qinghai, China. yangqien@nwipb.cas.cn.
Wen-Fa LvKey Lab of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China. wenfa2004@163.com.
Qin ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation & Utilization, College of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. qzhang@sdau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-5020

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1200404National Natural Science Foundation of China 32102526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate breed identification is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of indigenous farm animal genetic resources. In this study, we evaluated the phylogenetic relationships and genomic breed compositions of 13 sheep breeds using SNP and InDel data from whole genome sequencing. The breeds included 11 Chinese indigenous and 2 foreign commercial breeds. We compared different strategies for breed identification with respect to different marker types, i.e. SNPs, InDels, and a combination of SNPs and InDels (named SIs), different breed-informative marker detection methods, and different machine learning classification methods.

resultsUsing WGS-based SNPs and InDels, we revealed the phylogenetic relationships between 11 Chinese indigenous and two foreign sheep breeds and quantified their purities through estimated genomic breed compositions. We found that the optimal strategy for identifying these breeds was the combination of DFI_union for breed-informative marker detection, which integrated the methods of Delta, Pairwise Wright's FST, and Informativeness for Assignment (namely DFI) by merging the breed-informative markers derived from the three methods, and KSR for breed assignment, which integrated the methods of K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest (namely KSR) by intersecting their results. Using SI markers improved the identification accuracy compared to using SNPs or InDels alone. We achieved accuracies over 97.5% when using at least the 1000 most breed-informative (MBI) SI markers and even 100% when using 5000 SI markers.

conclusionsOur results provide not only an important foundation for conservation of these Chinese local sheep breeds, but also general approaches for breed identification of indigenous farm animal breeds.

Indexed as

BreedingINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSheepAnimalsChinaGenetics, PopulationPhylogenyWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39227836
PMCPMC11370120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.