ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Development, deployment and scaling of operating room-ready artificial intelligence for real-time surgical decision support.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-Assisted Oral Examination: Challenges and Innovations.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis and mitigation of equipment-induced shortcuts in AI models for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based automatic identification model of main pancreatic duct in intraoperative ultrasonography.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in assisted localization of fetal ultrasound standard planes: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Generative AI-Assisted Indication of Anatomical Landmarks to Enhance Safety under Intraoperative Bleeding in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Optimizing AI implementation for surgery: recommendations for infrastructure and deployment in the operating room.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Specialized foundation models for intelligent operating rooms.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of semantic segmentation of anatomical structures during minimally invasive lobectomy using a transformer-based deep learning architecture.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- An ophthalmic video foundation model for surgical recognition and navigation with wet-lab porcine eye validation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Prompt injection attacks on vision-language models for surgical decision support.npj digital surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical warrant in medical LLM evaluation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Review
- Comparison of segmentation performance of cnns, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning for computer vision can be leveraged for interpreting surgical scenes and providing surgeons with real-time guidance to avoid complications. However, neither generalizability nor scalability of computer-vision-based surgical guidance systems have been demonstrated, especially to geographic locations that lack hardware and infrastructure necessary for real-time inference. We propose a new equipment-agnostic framework for real-time use in operating suites. Using laparoscopic cholecystectomy and semantic segmentation models for predicting safe/dangerous ("Go"/"No-Go") zones of dissection as an example use case, this study aimed to develop and test the performance of a novel data pipeline linked to a web-platform that enables real-time deployment from any edge device. To test this infrastructure and demonstrate its scalability and generalizability, lightweight U-Net and SegFormer models were trained on annotated frames from a large and diverse multicenter dataset from 136 institutions, and then tested on a separate prospectively collected dataset. A web-platform was created to enable real-time inference on any surgical video stream, and performance was tested on and optimized for a range of network speeds. The U-Net and SegFormer models respectively achieved mean Dice scores of 57% and 60%, precision 45% and 53%, and recall 82% and 75% for predicting the Go zone, and mean Dice scores of 76% and 76%, precision 68% and 68%, and recall 92% and 92% for predicting the No-Go zone. After optimization of the client-server interaction over the network, we deliver a prediction stream of at least 60 fps and with a maximum round-trip delay of 70 ms for speeds above 8 Mbps. Clinical deployment of machine learning models for surgical guidance is feasible and cost-effective using a generalizable, scalable and equipment-agnostic framework that lacks dependency on hardware with high computing performance or ultra-fast internet connection speed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.