ArticleScientific reports2024
Causation between the gut microbiota and inguinal hernia: a two-sample double-sided Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward precision hernia surgery: integrating biomarkers, genomics, quantitative imaging, and artificial intelligence in abdominal wall repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Identifying potential drug targets for postoperative abdominal wall hernia using Mendelian randomization: a multi-omics study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inguinal hernias are the most common type of enterocele and are frequently caused by defects in the abdominal wall muscles in the groin area. Numerous animal models and human studies have shown that the gut microbiota is associated with skeletal muscle aging and loss. However, the causation between the gut microbiota and inguinal hernia remains unclear. To reveal the causal association between the gut microbiota and inguinal hernia, we conducted a two-sample double-sided Mendelian randomization analysis. We used genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) summary statistics of the gut microbiota from the MiBioGen consortium and GWAS statistics of inguinal hernia from the FinnGen R10 database. The causation between the gut microbiota and inguinal hernia was explored through the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, MR Egger regression method, weighted median method, weighted model method, and simple model method. Sensitivity analysis was used to test whether the Mendelian randomization analysis results were reliable. Reverse Mendelian randomization was used to conduct effect analysis and sensitivity analysis using the entire gut microbiota as the outcome. The IVW results indicated that Verrucomicrobia, Lactobacilliales, Clostridiaceae1, Butyricococcus, Categorybacter, Hungatella, Odoribacter, and Olsenella had a direct negative causation with the gut microbiota. The reverse Mendelian Randomization results showed that Eubacterium brachygroup, Eubacterium eligensgroup, Eubacterium xylanophilumgroup, Coprococcus3, Ruminococcus1, and Senegalimassilia were directly related to inguinal hernia. The bilateral sensitivity analysis revealed no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. The results confirmed that 8 bacterial traits had a negative causation with inguinal hernia. Reverse MR analysis revealed a positive correlation between inguinal hernia and 6 bacterial traits. Modulating the diversity and components of the gut microbiota is envisaged to contribute to improving the incidence and prognosis of inguinal hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.