Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Anthropogenic modification of a giant ground sloth tooth from Brazil supported by a multi-disciplinary approach.

Thaís R Pansani, Loïc Bertrand, Briana Pobiner, Anna K Behrensmeyer, Lidiane Asevedo, Mathieu Thoury, Hermínio I Araújo-Júnior, Sebastian Schöder, Andrew King, Mírian L A F Pacheco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FirstProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thaís R PansaniDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA. rabitopansanit@si.edu.
Loïc BertrandUniversité Paris-Saclay, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, PPSM, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Briana PobinerDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Anna K BehrensmeyerDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Lidiane AsevedoLaboratório de Ecologia e Geociências, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil.
Mathieu ThouryInstitut photonique d'analyse non-destructive européen des matériaux anciens, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, ministère de la Culture, UVSQ, MNHN, Saint-Aubin, France.
Hermínio I Araújo-JúniorDepartamento de Estratigrafia e Paleontologia, Faculdade de Geologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Sebastian SchöderSynchrotron Soleil, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Andrew KingSynchrotron Soleil, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Mírian L A F PachecoLaboratório de Paleobiologia e Astrobiologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil.
Mário A T DantasLaboratório de Ecologia e Geociências, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 420424/2023-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.569989/2020-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/04501-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying evidence of human modification of extinct animal remains, such as Pleistocene megafauna, is challenging due to the similarity of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic features observed under optical microscopy. Here, we re-investigate a Late Pleistocene ground sloth tooth from northeast Brazil, previously suggested as human-modified based only on optical observation. To characterize the macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the marks preserved in this tooth and evaluate potential human modification, we used stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) supplemented by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), UV photoluminescence (UV/PL), synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence (SR-XRF), and synchrotron micro-computed tomography (SR-µCT). These methods allowed us to discriminate non-anthropogenic taphonomic features (root and sedimentary damage), anthropogenic marks, and histological features. The latter shows the infiltration of exogenous elements into the dentine from the sediments. Our evidence demonstrates the sequence of anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic taphonomic modification of this tooth and supports its initial intentional modification by humans. We highlight the benefits of emerging imaging and spectral imaging techniques to investigate and diagnose human modification in fossil and archaeological records and propose that human modification of tooth tissues should be further considered when studying possibly anthropogenically altered fossil remains.

Indexed as

FossilsSlothsToothX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsBrazilHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionMegafaunaPleistoceneSouth AmericaTooth artifactZooarchaeology

Identifiers

PMID39227606
PMCPMC11371818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.