Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227583›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study.

Anneke L Eerkens, Koen Brummel, Annegé Vledder, Sterre T Paijens, Marta Requesens, Dominik Loiero, Nienke van Rooij, Annechien Plat, Floris-Jan Haan, Patty Klok and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04262089 (Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab in dMMR/ POLE-EDM Uterine Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04262089 phase1completednot on this map

Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab in dMMR/ POLE-EDM Uterine Cancer Patients: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2020 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsUterine CancerArmsPembrolizumab (Keytruda)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Therapeutic targeting of mismatch repair-deficient cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Anneke L Eerkens *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-196X
Koen Brummel *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1983-450X
Annegé VledderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sterre T PaijensDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marta RequesensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-8845
Dominik LoieroDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-0068
Nienke van RooijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annechien PlatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Floris-Jan HaanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Patty KlokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Refika YigitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-2203
Thijs RoelofsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Natascha M de LangeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Rie KlompDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Treant, Emmen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3312-0511
David ChurchWelcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4617-962X
Arja Ter ElstDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
René WardenaarEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9891-1897
Diana SpieringsEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-474X
Floris FoijerEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0989-3127
Viktor Hendrik KoelzerDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-4885
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-8437
Joost BartDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-071X
Mathilde JalvingDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-9050
Anna K L ReynersDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-7816
Marco de BruynDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.de.bruyn@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-9131
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. h.w.nijman@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1821-3042

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) 13537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorspembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39227583
PMCPMC11372054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.