ArticleNature communications2024
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04262089 (Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab in dMMR/ POLE-EDM Uterine Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab in dMMR/ POLE-EDM Uterine Cancer Patients: a Feasibility Study
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global research trends and focus on immunotherapy for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive bibliometric insight and visualization analysis (2012-2024).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- scXpand: Pan-cancer detection of T cell clonal expansion from single-cell RNA sequencing without paired single-cell TCR sequencing.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Review
- Pioneering preoperative anti-PD-1 immunotherapy enables curative resection in dMMR advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a case series (2020-2022).Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Precision immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: therapeutic combinations, biomarker strategies, and translational challenges.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in endometrial cancer: current insights and future directions.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Mismatch Repair as a Dynamic and Clinically Actionable Vulnerability in Cancer.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Therapeutic targeting of mismatch repair-deficient cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- A working group report from the 2024 National Cancer Institute / Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee endometrial cancer clinical trials planning meeting: refining the approach to endometrial cancer in the immunotherapy era.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Remodeling the tumor microenvironment: regulatory effects of β-sitosterol and luteolin on the immunosuppressive milieu in endometrial carcinoma and implications for combinatorial immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Drug discovery in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: Recent advances.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Gynecologic oncology in 2024: breakthrough trials and evolving treatment strategies for cervical, uterine corpus, and ovarian cancers.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Review
- The Role of Immunotherapy in MMR-Deficient Endometrial Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Genomic instability as a driver and suppressor of anti-tumor immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.