Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227552›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking.

Anna Chrabaszcz, Anna Laurinavichyute, Nina Ladinskaya, Liubov Baladzhaeva, Anat Prior, Andriy Myachykov, Olga Dragoy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna ChrabaszczLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Murdoch Building, 3420 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA. anc211@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-7245
Anna LaurinavichyuteDepartment of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3150-0206
Nina LadinskayaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Liubov BaladzhaevaDepartment of English Language and Literature, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Anat PriorDepartment of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Andriy MyachykovDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Olga DragoyCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study tests the hypothesis that the directionality of reading habits (left-to-right or right-to-left) impacts individuals' representation of nonspatial events. Using the blank screen paradigm, we examine whether eye movements reflect culture-specific spatial biases in processing temporal information, specifically, grammatical tense in Russian and Hebrew. Sixty-two native speakers of Russian (a language with a left-to-right reading and writing system) and 62 native speakers of Hebrew (a language with a right-to-left reading and writing system) listened to verbs in the past or future tense while their spontaneous gaze positions were recorded. Following the verb, a visual spatial probe appeared in one of the five locations of the screen, and participants responded manually to indicate its position. While participants' response latencies to the spatial probe revealed no significant effects, their gaze positions along the horizontal axis for past- and future-tensed verbs aligned with the reading and writing direction in their language. These results provide novel evidence that eye movements during auditory processing of grammatical tense are influenced by culturally specific reading and writing conventions, shifting leftward or rightward on the horizontal plane depending on the stimuli's time reference (past or future) and the participants' language (Russian or Hebrew). This spatial bias indicates a common underlying cognitive mechanism that uses spatial dimensions to represent temporal constructs.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsPsycholinguisticsReadingSpace PerceptionWritingAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansLanguageMaleYoung AdultEye movementsGrammatical tenseOcular driftReading–writing habits hypothesisSpace–time congruency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.